
I woke up early this morning—probably around 5 a.m.—with a craving for hot chocolate. I didn’t have any in the house, but I think I’ll pick some up later today at the supermarket. You see, the important things in life are often the small things. A craving for hot chocolate on a cold winter morning might seem minor, but maybe it’s my body telling me it needs a little warmth, a little comfort, or even just a bit of chocolate energy. As I say, the small things often matter most.
This is partly why I’ve taken a more neutral, observational look at the growing noise from newspaper opinion columnists who’ve been saying some fairly unkind things about Afrikaans people applying for refugee status in the United States.
Much of this noise is coming from a certain kind of old British stock in this country—those who’ve never really liked Afrikaans people, if we’re honest. Most of them haven’t. It’s an old resentment, dressed up in modern language. What’s more disappointing is how easily people jump on the bandwagon. Some do it to boost their public profile, writing for newspapers that serve the interests of big business and government. And yes, business gets contracts from government. It’s all connected.
These columnists are serving the same masters. If they didn’t toe the line, they’d lose their jobs. So you’ll never hear an opposing view. Newspapers and their writers are simply too afraid of the prevailing political climate.
Those unfamiliar with South African history might not know much about the two Anglo-Boer wars, or the way the British treated Afrikaans people during that time. I won’t go into the full horror of it here—history records it well enough. But it’s worth remembering that the disdain towards Afrikaans culture has old roots. And it hasn’t vanished.
Yesterday, I came across a wave of TikTok comments, and while some may argue it’s not the most reliable source of opinion, the sentiments were loud and clear. A number of Americans were attacking Afrikaans people—those trying to seek refugee status. It struck me as odd. One would think Americans, with their own layered history of migration and marginalization, might show more tolerance. But instead, many joined the chorus of criticism.
I wonder if they really understand just how marginalized Afrikaans people have been under the current South African government over the past 30 years. It’s something worth thinking about. Yes, it’s social media. But words travel, and the tone was anything but kind.
Returning to our own past again: the disdain of the British wasn’t reserved just for Afrikaans people. In the old Natal province and in parts of the Cape, people who weren’t British weren’t even allowed to join certain clubs. Another group who faced similar exclusion were Jewish people. And not so long ago, in Cape Town’s more elite circles, they weren’t allowed into some of the upper echelon private clubs. If you know your history, you’ll recognize a pattern: like the Jews, Afrikaans people have carried the burden of being treated as “less than.”
Many Afrikaans people left long ago—some when the British arrived more than a century ago. Many fled to go farm in South America. ?Some moved inland into harsh, dry regions. The Dorslanders. Others moved into what is now Namibia, Angola, Zimbabwe, and Zambia. There’s a long pattern of moving to survive, of seeking safety elsewhere.
Today, Afrikaans people are again being publicly criticized, mocked, and attacked—by some of the current leaders of the country. It’s constant. It’s daily. And it’s allowed because Afrikaans people have become a soft target. The majority is massive. And many in leadership know this.
That said, people are welcome to their opinions. This is a world of free speech, and social media has made it easier than ever to voice those opinions. But what’s being lost in all of this is nuance. Context. And basic cultural respect.
And maybe that’s why hot chocolate at 5 a.m. felt so comforting. It wasn’t noisy, or political, or performative. It was just… honest.